The Alaska Supreme Court rejected the Dunleavy administration’s plans to overhaul public sector union membership rules in a unanimous decision issued Friday.
against the state and in favor of the unions — a decision that was affirmed by the Alaska Supreme Court on Friday.
“We are thrilled. We are unsurprised,” said Heidi Drygas, executive director of the Alaska State Employees Association, in an interview about Friday’s decision. “We felt really strongly about our case, and the Supreme Court basically confirmed that — with quite a walloping.”The 2018 Janus decision stated that non-union state employees could not be forced to pay fees in order to receive benefits negotiated by unions representing their co-workers.
“While the decision from the Alaska Supreme Court was disappointing, it was not surprising, as clarification in regard to thedecision ultimately has to come from the United States Supreme Court given its federal constitutional underpinnings,” Taylor said. “We are hopeful that we can get clear guidance from this court in order to make sure State action does not jeopardize individual liberties.
Norge Siste Nytt, Norge Overskrifter
Similar News:Du kan også lese nyheter som ligner på denne som vi har samlet inn fra andre nyhetskilder.
Alaska Gov. Dunleavy says court decision limiting federal regulation of wetlands aids 'responsible development’One Alaska project that could be affected by Thursday's Supreme Court decision limiting the EPA’s authority over wetlands is the proposed Pebble Mine, upstream from Bristol Bay.
Les mer »
Supreme Court reins in Biden admin’s power over U.S. waterwaysThe Supreme Court rolled back the Environmental Protection Agency’s reach over U.S. waterways, dousing the Biden administration’s regulatory push and handing a victory to an Idaho couple blocked from building a house because the agency deemed their property a wetland.
Les mer »
U.S. Supreme Court rules against EPA in wetlands regulation challengeThe U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday put another dent in the regulatory reach of the Environmental Protection Agency, ruling in favor of an Idaho couple in their long-running bid to build a home on property that the EPA had deemed a protected wetland under a landmark federal anti-pollution law.
Les mer »
Supreme Court rules against EPA in dispute over regulating wetlandsThe Supreme Court ruled against the Environmental Protection Agency in a dispute over its authority to regulate certain wetlands under the Clean Water Act.
Les mer »
Supreme Court rules against EPA in challenge by Idaho coupleThe Supreme Court put another dent in the regulatory reach of the EPA, ruling in favor of an Idaho couple in their long-running bid to build a home on property that the EPA had deemed a protected wetland under a landmark federal anti-pollution law.
Les mer »
Supreme Court rules for homeowner in 'equity theft' disputeThe Supreme Court revives a 94-year-old woman’s claim that a Minnesota county violated the Constitution’s Fifth Amendment by keeping a $25,000 profit when it sold her home in a tax foreclosure sale.
Les mer »