At the Supreme Court, it's taking longer to hear cases

Norge Nyheter Nyheter

At the Supreme Court, it's taking longer to hear cases
Norge Siste Nytt,Norge Overskrifter
  • 📰 wjxt4
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 28 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 15%
  • Publisher: 63%

Arguments that usually lasted an hour in the morning have stretched well beyond two, and on many days it's long past lunchtime before the court breaks.

, who replaced retiring Justice Stephen Breyer, is also a “considerably more active questioner” than her predecessor, Jay said.

During the 1800s, when the justices heard arguments from noon to 4 p.m. without a lunch break, tables were set up behind the bench and the justices would leave one or two at a time to eat. These days there's no leaving the bench to eat during arguments, though justices sometimes duck out to go to the bathroom. In October, when the court heard back-to-back arguments in

Seth Waxman, a veteran of more than 80 Supreme Court arguments, once remarked that for Rehnquist: “The red light ended everything — absolutely everything."

Vi har oppsummert denne nyheten slik at du kan lese den raskt. Er du interessert i nyhetene kan du lese hele teksten her. Les mer:

wjxt4 /  🏆 246. in US

Norge Siste Nytt, Norge Overskrifter

Similar News:Du kan også lese nyheter som ligner på denne som vi har samlet inn fra andre nyhetskilder.

At the Supreme Court, it's taking longer to hear casesAt the Supreme Court, it's taking longer to hear casesSupreme Court arguments are continuing long after a red light tells lawyers to stop
Les mer »

At the Supreme Court, It's Taking Longer to Hear CasesAt the Supreme Court, It's Taking Longer to Hear CasesWhen lawyers argue before the Supreme Court, a small white light goes on to tell them when their time is almost expired and then a red light signals when they should stop. But arguments this term are extending well beyond the red light's cue.
Les mer »

At the Supreme Court, it's taking longer to hear casesAt the Supreme Court, it's taking longer to hear casesSupreme Court arguments that usually lasted an hour in the morning have stretched well beyond two, and on many days it's long past lunchtime before the court breaks.
Les mer »

At the Supreme Court, it's taking longer to hear casesAt the Supreme Court, it's taking longer to hear casesSupreme Court arguments are continuing long after a red light tells lawyers to stop.
Les mer »

At the Supreme Court, it’s taking longer to hear casesAt the Supreme Court, it’s taking longer to hear casesJustices have said in the past that lawyers' written briefs, not oral arguments, most influence their decisions, so it's unclear if the extra time is really helping them decide cases.
Les mer »

At the Supreme Court, it’s taking longer to hear casesAt the Supreme Court, it’s taking longer to hear casesWhen lawyers argue before the Supreme Court, a small white light goes on to tell them when their time is almost expired and then a red light signals when they should stop. But arguments this term are extending well beyond the red light's cue.
Les mer »



Render Time: 2025-03-10 12:49:28