Ban on marijuana users owning guns is unconstitutional, U.S. judge rules

Norge Nyheter Nyheter

Ban on marijuana users owning guns is unconstitutional, U.S. judge rules
Norge Siste Nytt,Norge Overskrifter
  • 📰 Reuters
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 35 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 17%
  • Publisher: 97%

A federal law prohibiting marijuana users from possessing firearms is unconstitutional, a federal judge in Oklahoma has concluded, citing last year's U.S. Supreme Court ruling that significantly expanded gun rights.

"The mere use of marijuana carries none of the characteristics that the Nation's history and tradition of firearms regulation supports," Wyrick wrote.

Laura Deskin, a public defender representing Harrison, said the ruling was a "step in the right direction for a large number of Americans who deserve the right to bear arms and protect their homes just like any other American." She called marijuana the most commonly used drug illegal at the federal level.

That ruling, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, announced a new test for assessing firearms laws, saying restrictions must be "consistent with this nation's historical tradition of firearm regulation."in declaring unconstitutional a federal law barring people under domestic violence restraining orders from owning firearms.

Vi har oppsummert denne nyheten slik at du kan lese den raskt. Er du interessert i nyhetene kan du lese hele teksten her. Les mer:

Reuters /  🏆 2. in US

Norge Siste Nytt, Norge Overskrifter

Similar News:Du kan også lese nyheter som ligner på denne som vi har samlet inn fra andre nyhetskilder.

Former law clerks say respect, honor system will protect Supreme Court from future leaksFormer law clerks say respect, honor system will protect Supreme Court from future leaksThe Supreme Court’s report on its probe of the leak of a draft abortion opinion last year revealed weaknesses in an antiquated security protocol, but former law clerks say it’s really respect for the court — and its honor system — would prevent a future leak.
Les mer »

How the Supreme Court Could Finally Force Big Oil to Face TrialHow the Supreme Court Could Finally Force Big Oil to Face TrialDozens of cities and states sued oil giants for deceiving the public. The Supreme Court could soon break these cases out of limbo.
Les mer »

The Supreme Court’s assault on Americans strikes againThe Supreme Court’s assault on Americans strikes againWomen are five times more likely to be killed by abusive partners with access to guns. Apparently, the Supreme Court couldn't care less. (via Deadline: Legal Blog)
Les mer »

Not much would change in California if the U.S. Supreme Court strikes down affirmative actionNot much would change in California if the U.S. Supreme Court strikes down affirmative actionBut hundreds of universities in other states where affirmative action has long been a legal practice will likely to adopt practices like UC’s, making family wealth and education negative factors in…
Les mer »

State GOP takes bid to end early voting to Arizona Supreme CourtState GOP takes bid to end early voting to Arizona Supreme CourtFor Star subscribers: An Arizona law passed in 1991 allows anyone to request an early ballot, with no requirement to provide an excuse to vote early.
Les mer »

Supreme Court decision allows early release of former Mongols biker in pipe bomb caseSupreme Court decision allows early release of former Mongols biker in pipe bomb caseRichard Mathews was convicted in 1993 of planting pipe bomb that maimed an unintended target instead of the man who expelled him from the Mongols biker gang
Les mer »



Render Time: 2025-03-09 17:15:36