Kavanaugh implied that overturning Roe v. Wade would be celebrated as a victory for democracy.
Kavanaugh continued this strategy—pretend to ask a question, then announce his own views—throughout the morning. He complained to Julie Rikelman, attorney for abortion providers, that the court has been forced “to pick sides on the most contentious social debate in American life.” Worse, it has been forced “to do so in a situation” where, according to “the other side,” the Constitution is “neutral.
"The court has been forced ... to pick sides in the most contentious social debate in American life ... [but] the Constitution is neutral on the question of abortion."
Norge Siste Nytt, Norge Overskrifter
Similar News:Du kan også lese nyheter som ligner på denne som vi har samlet inn fra andre nyhetskilder.
Fact-checking the Arguments That Could Overturn Roe v. WadeA limited list of the more egregious fallacies raised in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization
Les mer »
Gutting ‘Roe’ Means 2022 Will Be All About Abortion RightsWith the conservative-majority Supreme Court expected to roll back abortion rights next year, the danger in handing even more power to Republicans should be front and center in the midterms. Read the latest from theericlutz:
Les mer »
This Supreme Court will gut Roe vs. Wade as only these justices canThe way these justices are likely to rule, the post-Roe reality for women and our politics looks grim, plus more from the week in Opinion.
Les mer »
Anti-abortion advocates thrilled with possibility of overturning Roe v. WadeAnti-abortion activists feel like they’re on the cusp of history after the Supreme Court signaled a willingness to weaken Roe v. Wade — and they’re already gearing up for the inevitable multifront fight that will erupt if the court rules in their favor.
Les mer »
Amy Coney Bryant Says Putting The Baby Up For Adoption'Takes Care of the Problem' of Negative Consequences Of Forced ParenthoodThe first oral arguments in the Supreme Court's Mississippi abortion case reveal polarizing justices and a daunting future without Roe v. Wade.
Les mer »
Kavanaugh cites landmark gay rights cases in argument about abortion restrictionsLawyers who argued for landmark LGBTQ rights cases — Obergefell v. Hodges and Lawrence v. Texas — were conflicted on the validity of Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s argument.
Les mer »