ESPN’s Bill Barnwell suggests Seahawks should trade down from both first-round picks

Norge Nyheter Nyheter

ESPN’s Bill Barnwell suggests Seahawks should trade down from both first-round picks
Norge Siste Nytt,Norge Overskrifter
  • 📰 FieldGulls
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 79 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 35%
  • Publisher: 68%

How about a double trade down to make up for recent years of not trading down?

$4 million guaranteed to be Smith’s backup. It’s not out of the question Seattle drafts a passer — Richardson? — and installs him as the No. 3 option, but the Lock signing might also be an indication the organization doesn’t like the top quarterbacks, no matter how manyLet’s say the Seahawks are not drafting a quarterback.

Seattle typically doesn’t draft this high, so this might be a chance to add someone at a key position such as Anderson if four quarterbacks come off the board to start the draft. It’s typically more valuable to move down and add more premium selections if you’re offered first- and second-round picks as part of a deal, though. If the Seahawks can land a future first-rounder from the Titans or Commanders as part of a trade up for a quarterback, Schneider should be amenable to moving back.

Likewise, the Seahawks don’t need receivers and should be trying to solicit interest from the teams below them. We’ve seen them be comfortable moving down to the bottom of the first round and even to the top of the second round in this range, so I’m not sure they typically see much difference between the players in the 20s and the ones available 10 or 15 picks later.

What happens here might depend on what Seattle elects to do with the No. 5 pick. If it drafts a quarterback who won’t play much in 2022, this selection might be coach Pete Carroll’s chance to add an immediate contributor to the roster. If the Seahawks draft a non-quarterback early, they are more likely to trade away this pick for additional selections, possibly to take a quarterback later in the draft.

Alright I have to assume by “The Seahawks don’t need receivers” he means that they don’t absolutely need to use a first-round pick on a wide receiver, or at least not at 20th. Because otherwise, and I’m unapologetic in beating this drum, the Seahawks need wide receiver depth.

Vi har oppsummert denne nyheten slik at du kan lese den raskt. Er du interessert i nyhetene kan du lese hele teksten her. Les mer:

FieldGulls /  🏆 66. in US

Norge Siste Nytt, Norge Overskrifter

Similar News:Du kan også lese nyheter som ligner på denne som vi har samlet inn fra andre nyhetskilder.

Seahawks News 4/3: Who’s the safest pick the Seahawks can make at 5?Seahawks News 4/3: Who’s the safest pick the Seahawks can make at 5?Pre-Snap Reads 4/3: Who’s the ‘safest’ pick the Seahawks can make at 5?
Les mer »

Seahawks News 4/4: Why did the Seahawks let Ryan Neal walkSeahawks News 4/4: Why did the Seahawks let Ryan Neal walkPre-Snap Reads 4/4: Why did the Seahawks let Ryan Neal walk?
Les mer »

2023 NFL Draft: What would the ‘perfect’ first round look like for the Seahawks?2023 NFL Draft: What would the ‘perfect’ first round look like for the Seahawks?Cast your votes!
Les mer »

Seahawks Drafts from the Past: 1983Seahawks Drafts from the Past: 1983Our newest staff writer WeaponNext has written his first article for Field Gulls! Let’s get in the time machine! Seahawks Drafts from the Past: 1983
Les mer »

Seahawks hopeful for reunion with Poona Ford, a good ideaSeahawks hopeful for reunion with Poona Ford, a good ideaAs Ford remains unsigned, he’s still the best option at the position.
Les mer »

2023 NFL Draft preview: Scouting report on Georgia tight end Darnell Washington2023 NFL Draft preview: Scouting report on Georgia tight end Darnell WashingtonCould the Seahawks look to add a Bulldog to the mix?
Les mer »



Render Time: 2025-03-06 06:25:42