'The three liberal Supreme Court justices decided to let Donziger's absurd contempt conviction stand,' said one observer.
his electronic devices to Chevron lawyers in a case filed by the company. The fossil fuel company argued Donziger had won the lawsuit for the Ecuadorians through "coercion, fraud, and bribery."
The judge appointed three special prosecutors after the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York declined to prosecute Donziger for contempt of court. Donziger argued the judge had no right to appoint private attorneys as special prosecutors, saying the move violated the Appointments Clause of the Constitution and that the judge wrongly overrode the U.S. attorney's discretion.
The Supreme Court's refusal to hear his case, said Donziger, represents "a huge blow to the rule of law."The attorney was among those who pointed to Gorsuch's argument in favor of hearing the case, in which the Trump-appointed right-wing justice said his prosecution by three private lawyers "broke a basic constitutional promise essential to our liberty.".
Convicting someone of a federal crime generally requires two branches of government—prosecutors representing the executive branch and judges representing the judiciary—to agree on the accused person's guilt.
Norge Siste Nytt, Norge Overskrifter
Similar News:Du kan også lese nyheter som ligner på denne som vi har samlet inn fra andre nyhetskilder.
U.S. Supreme Court lets Chevron foe Donziger's contempt conviction standThe U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear a disbarred environmental lawyer's challenge to his criminal contempt conviction after he earlier won but was unable to collect a $9.5 billion judgment against Chevron Corp over oil pollution in Ecuadorian rainforests.
Les mer »
Mexico government to challenge Supreme Court suspension of electoral reformThe Mexican government said Sunday it would challenge the Supreme Court's temporary suspension of parts of a controversial electoral reform pushed by President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador.
Les mer »
'Poop-themed dog toys' face Supreme Court showdown in trademark disputeThe Supreme Court to debate whether Jack Daniel's has to grin and bear it over humorous dog 'poop-themed' toys that bear a resemblance to its iconic whiskey bottles.
Les mer »
Supreme Court chews on Jack Daniel’s dog toy disputeThe question for the court has to do with whether the toy makers infringed on Jack Daniel’s trademarks.
Les mer »
US Supreme Court examines law against encouraging illegal immigrationThe U.S. Supreme Court on Monday will consider whether a federal law that made it a crime for a person to encourage illegal immigration violates constitutional free speech protections in a case involving a California man who deceived immigrants through a phony 'adult adoption' program.
Les mer »
ACLU asks US Supreme Court to review N.H.'s criminal defamation statuteThe law's critics allege it is a tool for those in positions of power, including members of law enforcement, to silence those who speak out against them. The statute is also unevenly applied, the ACLU contends.
Les mer »