John Roberts interpreted Elena Kagan’s dissent as, in his words, a “personal” affront.
from Missouri that could have sued to defend its own interests, but refused to do so, and even refused to help Missouri “represent” it in court. Roberts didn’t care about any of that.
is “an instrumentality of Missouri,” he wrote, and Biden’s plan “will cut ’s revenues.” So, according to Roberts and the court’s five other hard-line conservatives, the state had established standing. From there, he easily concluded that the HEROES Act did not authorize large-scale debt relief, citing the court’s recently invented “major questions” doctrine. Nothing this “textualist” court decided in this case is because of the plain text of the statute, mind you.
are interchangeable, citing the Missouri Supreme Court’s own declaration that they are not. And she eviscerated the majority for “wielding the major-questions sword” to overrule “legislative judgments” that belong to the political branches.
Norge Siste Nytt, Norge Overskrifter
Similar News:Du kan også lese nyheter som ligner på denne som vi har samlet inn fra andre nyhetskilder.
Opinion | The worst part about John Roberts’ celebrated Supreme Court rulingChief Justice John Roberts' opinion 'laid landmines for future elections by recalling the court’s infamous ruling in Bush v. Gore,' writes levinsonjessica
Les mer »
Supreme Court rejects use of race as factor in college admissions, ending affirmative actionBREAKING: The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that race-conscious university admission policies violate the Constitution, bringing an end to affirmative action in higher education in a decision that will reverberate across campuses nationwide.
Les mer »
Supreme Court sets new limits on affirmative action programs in landmark rulingBREAKING: Supreme Court sets new limits in use of race as a factor in college admissions.
Les mer »
Here's how each Supreme Court justice voted to decide the affirmative action casesChief Justice John Roberts wrote the majority opinion for both cases.
Les mer »
John Roberts' own words used against him in student loan dissent'After today, no one will have to go back 50 years for the classic case of the Court manipulating standing doctrine, rather than obeying the edict to stay in its lane,' Justice Elena Kagan wrote in dissent of the Supreme Court's majority decision.
Les mer »
Read the Supreme Court’s decision on affirmative actionRead the full decision, authored by Chief Justice John Roberts. Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented.
Les mer »