The Supreme Court said in a letter to Congress that there is “nothing to suggest” that Justice Samuel Alito violated ethics standards following a report that a 2014 decision he wrote was leaked in advance of its announcement.
that there is “nothing to suggest” that Justice Samuel Alito violated ethics standards following a report that a 2014 decision he wrote was leaked in advance of its announcement.New York Times report earlier this month
. But while that leak was a public disclosure of the text, the new report alleged that in the 2014 case, the disclosure wasn't as broad.
Norge Siste Nytt, Norge Overskrifter
Similar News:Du kan også lese nyheter som ligner på denne som vi har samlet inn fra andre nyhetskilder.
Supreme Court counsel defends Justice Alito after he denied allegation of 2014 leakThe U.S. Supreme Court's top legal adviser is defending Justice Samuel Alito after top Democrats on the Senate and House Judiciary Committees had publicly raised concerns about Alito's alleged ethics lapses, which Alito strongly denied.
Les mer »
Supreme Court rejects claim that Alito leaked 2014 opinion on Burwell v Hobby LobbyThe Supreme Court this week rejected claims that Justice Alito leaked a court opinion in 2014 on whether a contraception mandate violated companies' religious freedom.
Les mer »
Supreme Court defends Justice Samuel Alito against 2014 leak allegationIn a letter to lawmakers, the Supreme Court defended Justice Samuel Alito against an allegation that he leaked a 2014 SCOTUS ruling in a landmark religious liberty case.
Les mer »
Judiciary Democrats accuse Supreme Court of dodging questions about alleged 2014 leakSen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) and Rep. Hank Johnson (D-GA), chairmen of the Senate and House Judiciary Courts Subcommittees respectively, accused the Supreme Court's attorney of failing to 'substantively answer' their questions about allegations of a 2014 high court leak.
Les mer »
The Supreme Court Stonewalls In Defense Of Samuel AlitoThe court acted as defense counsel in response to threats of congressional inquiries into its ethical lapses.
Les mer »