Comedy Central aired an episode titled “The Worldwide Privacy Tour” mocking Meghan Markle, 41, and Prince Harry, 38, and their decision to move to the US to seek a private life.
The Duchess of Sussex apparently doesn’t think “South Park” is funny.
The duchess is reportedly “upset and overwhelmed” by the episode and “annoyed by ‘South Park’ but refuses to watch it all."Royal Reporter Meanwhile, “South Park” didn’t explicitly name the couple and began the episode with a disclaimer saying all characters are fictional — even if they’re based on real people.
The “wife” character, clearly referring to Markle, is described as a “sorority girl, actress, influencer and victim,” to which she replies: “Yeah, that’s totally me.”
Norge Siste Nytt, Norge Overskrifter
Similar News:Du kan også lese nyheter som ligner på denne som vi har samlet inn fra andre nyhetskilder.
Meghan Markle has been 'upset and overwhelmed' by portrayal on 'South Park' episode: reportMeghan Markle is reportedly 'annoyed' and 'upset' by Wednesday's episode of 'South Park' that seeming mocked the Duke and Duchess of Sussex
Les mer »
Meghan Markle down on ‘South Park’ for mocking royal coupleMeghan Markle and Prince Harry weren’t thrilled with how they were parodied in the latest “South Park” episode.
Les mer »
Meghan Markle and Prince Harry face 'South Park' parody while battling legal woesThe Fox News Entertainment newsletter brings you the latest Hollywood headlines, celebrity interviews and stories from Los Angeles and beyond.
Les mer »
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle break silence on South Park lawsuit claimsHarry and Meghan's spokesperson told Newsweek speculation they might sue after being roasted on South Park was 'baseless and boring.'
Les mer »
Miss Manners: There’s something dubious about the story of Meghan Markle’s curtsyWhy would she, an American, have been expected to do this?
Les mer »
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle Are “In a Predicament” Over Coronation AttendanceHere’s everything we know so far about the Sussexes’ attendance (or potential lack thereof).
Les mer »