Opinion | How the Government Justifies Its Social-Media Censorship

Norge Nyheter Nyheter

Opinion | How the Government Justifies Its Social-Media Censorship
Norge Siste Nytt,Norge Overskrifter
  • 📰 WSJ
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 18 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 11%
  • Publisher: 63%

From WSJopinion: The Supreme Court has adopted doctrines that make it hard for officials to see that they’re acting unconstitutionally, writes Philip Hamburger

On March 9, 2023, journalists Matt Taibbi and Michael Shellenberger testified before a congressional hearing on the growth of 'a censorship-industrial complex' that violates the right to free speech. Images: AP/AFP/Getty Images/Zuma Press Composite: Mark KellyMissouri v.

Biden,challenging the federal government’s campaign to censor speech on social media. For years, officials at the White House, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Department of Homeland Security, the Central Intelligence Agency and other agencies have pressured tech companies to suppress “misinformation.”Continue reading your article with

Vi har oppsummert denne nyheten slik at du kan lese den raskt. Er du interessert i nyhetene kan du lese hele teksten her. Les mer:

WSJ /  🏆 98. in US

Norge Siste Nytt, Norge Overskrifter

Similar News:Du kan også lese nyheter som ligner på denne som vi har samlet inn fra andre nyhetskilder.

Opinion: Why today's Supreme Court decision on voting rights is such a shockOpinion: The decision in Allen vs. Milligan is most significant for what the court didn’t do: It did not further weaken the law of voting rights as many expected.
Les mer »

Opinion | The Supreme Court’s Voting Rights Act ruling is no victory for democracyOpinion | The Supreme Court’s Voting Rights Act ruling is no victory for democracyOpinion by By Melissa Murray and Steve Vladeck: The court's decision in the Alabama redistricting case must be considered in the broader context.
Les mer »

Supreme Court justices’ robes aren’t red or blue | OpinionSupreme Court justices’ robes aren’t red or blue | OpinionA former New Jersey Supreme Court justice says the decision in the Alabama redistricting case makes it easier for us to see the U.S. high court as one about ideas, instead of politics.
Les mer »

Report Aileen Cannon to oversee Donald Trump case sparks backlashReport Aileen Cannon to oversee Donald Trump case sparks backlash'She can be expected to issue legally unsupported opinion after opinion,' one critic wrote.
Les mer »

Supreme Court of Canada won't hear unvaccinated woman's case for organ donationSupreme Court of Canada won't hear unvaccinated woman's case for organ donationOTTAWA — The Supreme Court of Canada will not hear the appeal of an Alberta woman who was unwilling to be vaccinated against COVID\u002D19 in order to get a…
Les mer »

Supreme Court sides with Black voters, rules Alabama's congressional maps violate Voting Rights ActSupreme Court sides with Black voters, rules Alabama's congressional maps violate Voting Rights ActBlack voters had challenged the redrawing of the 2022 election maps.
Les mer »



Render Time: 2025-03-05 00:58:29