Steven Lubet: The focus on whether Justice Gorsuch was or wasn’t asked to wear a face covering misses the point: He shouldn’t have had to be asked in the first place. - NBCNewsTHINK
No one likes wearing masks, whether it’s doctors or grocery store clerks, but we wear them out of a commitment to the greater good. When a Supreme Court justice can’t make this small sacrifice for the health of his immunocompromised colleague, it underscores how low the standards of comity on the high court may have sunk, regardless of how chummy Gorsuch and Sotomayor actually remain.
Elsewhere, the Supreme Court takes Covid precautions seriously. After hearing cases remotely for the entire previous term, the justices returned cautiously for live arguments last fall. The building is still closed to visitors, and are given very specific instructions to wear “an N95 or KN95 mask in the Courtroom, except when presenting argument,” with the approved masks provided in the lawyers’ lounge.Code of Conduct for United States Judges
says as much, calling upon judges to be “respectful and courteous” toward everyone “with whom the judge deals in an official capacity,” including fellow judges. What could be more discourteous than knowingly causing a coworker so much discomfort that she leaves the room? Although the high court has not officially adopted the code, theSotomayor’s life as a diabetic has not been easy.
The same cannot be said of Gorsuch. Even if he rejects the science behind the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s endorsement of masking in closed spaces, it would cause him at most slight discomfort to wear a mask for a couple of hours in the courtroom.
Norge Siste Nytt, Norge Overskrifter
Similar News:Du kan også lese nyheter som ligner på denne som vi har samlet inn fra andre nyhetskilder.
Is Ginni Thomas a Threat to the Supreme Court?“Ginni Thomas is behaving horribly, and she’s hurt the Supreme Court and the administration of justice,” the judicial ethicist Stephen Gillers said. “If you could take a secret poll of the other eight Justices, I have no doubt that they are appalled.”
Les mer »
U.S. Supreme Court to weigh limits on its own Oklahoma tribal rulingThe U.S. Supreme Court on Friday agreed to consider limiting the scope of its own 2020 ruling that greatly expanded Native American tribal authority in Oklahoma in a case involving a man convicted of child neglect.
Les mer »
University Hospitals reinstates vaccine requirement for caregivers after Supreme Court ruling'Since the vaccine became available in late 2020, we have encouraged our caregivers to get vaccinated and made vaccines readily available to them.'
Les mer »
Opinion | The Supreme Court Deals Another Body Blow to Women in Texas\u0022This case is a disaster for the rule of law and a grave disservice to women in Texas.\u0022
Les mer »
Supreme Court to weigh limits on its own Oklahoma tribal reservation rulingUS Supreme Court agrees to consider limiting a recent decision about Indian land in Oklahoma that the state says has produced chaos in its courts.
Les mer »
I Am Embarrassed for the Supreme CourtDon’t let the absurdity distract from the deep awfulness of what has happened.
Les mer »