Opinion by Dana Milbank | The Supreme Court radicals’ new precedent: Maximum chaos
a commonality to the rulings. Both decisions foment maximum chaos and were delivered with flagrant disregard for the instability and disorder they will cause.The high court was meant to be the guarantor of law and order. But the conservative justices, intoxicated by their supermajority, have abandoned their solemn duty to promote stability in the law and are actively spreading real-world disruption.
and the White House to overthrow the election. Yet Thomas, the senior associate justice, has refused to recuse himself from related cases.After decades of crocodile tears over imagined “judicial activism,” the conservative supermajority has shed all judicial modesty and embraced radicalism. The liberal justices, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Stephen G.
Norge Siste Nytt, Norge Overskrifter
Similar News:Du kan også lese nyheter som ligner på denne som vi har samlet inn fra andre nyhetskilder.
Roe v. Wade Overturned: Artists React As America Wipes Away Reproductive RightsThe Supreme Court has officially overturned Roe v. Wade — and here's how artists are reacting.
Les mer »
Opinion | 5 big truths about the Supreme Court’s gutting of RoeIt's where all our political fights will play out, and Democrats need to treat it that way
Les mer »
In Roe decision, Justice Clarence Thomas invites new legal challenges to contraception and same-sex marriage rightsFueling already heightened anxieties from women and LGBTQ groups that the end of Roe could be the tip of the iceberg, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote that “in future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents.”
Les mer »
Pelosi on abortion ruling: 'Radical Supreme Court is eviscerating Americans' rights'House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a California Democrat, blasted the Supreme Court's ruling on Friday that overturns Roe v. Wade, the landmark 1973 decision that...
Les mer »
Supreme Court opens door to overturning rights to relationships, marriages between same-sex couplesIn a separate concurring opinion, Justice Clarence Thomas said the court should review other precedents, including its 2015 decision legalizing marriage between same-sex couples.
Les mer »
Supreme Court opens door to overturning rights to relationships, marriages between same-sex couplesIn a separate concurring opinion, Justice Clarence Thomas said the court should review other precedents, including its 2015 decision legalizing marriage between same-sex couples.
Les mer »