Oregon city tells Supreme Court that ticketing homeless people isn’t cruel and unusual punishment

Norge Nyheter Nyheter

Oregon city tells Supreme Court that ticketing homeless people isn’t cruel and unusual punishment
Norge Siste Nytt,Norge Overskrifter
  • 📰 WashTimes
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 19 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 11%
  • Publisher: 63%

Grants Pass, Oregon, asked the Supreme Court to hear its legal battle over ticketing homeless people living in public encampments after a federal appeals court blocked the city from issuing the citations, saying it was cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Constitution.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals issued an injunction halting Grants Pass, in southern Oregon, from issuing civil fines to homeless people camping on public land.

Lawyers for the city, though, told the high court it should review the case because a civil fine doesn’t amount to a painful punishment and the lower court’s ruling is infringing on cities’ attempts to deal with the homeless crisis. The city’s legal team also said conflicting rulings exist from the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals over similar civil ordinances.

Vi har oppsummert denne nyheten slik at du kan lese den raskt. Er du interessert i nyhetene kan du lese hele teksten her. Les mer:

WashTimes /  🏆 235. in US

Norge Siste Nytt, Norge Overskrifter

Similar News:Du kan også lese nyheter som ligner på denne som vi har samlet inn fra andre nyhetskilder.

Arizona Supreme Court to review state Court of Appeals abortion rulingArizona Supreme Court to review state Court of Appeals abortion rulingThe Arizona Supreme Court will reassess a lower court’s conclusion that abortion doctors can't be prosecuted under a pre-statehood law that bans the procedure in nearly all cases.
Les mer »

Texas Supreme Court denies request to delay new election law despite lawsuit challenging itTexas Supreme Court denies request to delay new election law despite lawsuit challenging itThe Texas Supreme Court has ruled that a new Republican-backed law that dictates how elections will be run in the Democratic stronghold of Houston and its surrounding county will take effect as scheduled next month despite a lawsuit seeking to overturn it
Les mer »

Texas Supreme Court denies request to delay new election law despite lawsuit challenging itTexas Supreme Court denies request to delay new election law despite lawsuit challenging itThe Texas Supreme Court has ruled that a new Republican-backed law that dictates how elections will be run in the Democratic stronghold of Houston and its surrounding county will take effect as scheduled next month despite a lawsuit seeking to overturn it.
Les mer »

Texas Supreme Court lets state law eliminating Harris County elections chief stand, for nowTexas Supreme Court lets state law eliminating Harris County elections chief stand, for nowThe ruling means the November elections in the state’s largest county will be overseen by two other county officials. Legislators targeted Harris County’s elections department after taking issue with the way the 2022 elections were run.
Les mer »

Texas Supreme Court lets state law eliminating Harris County elections chief stand, for nowTexas Supreme Court lets state law eliminating Harris County elections chief stand, for nowThe ruling means the November elections in the state’s largest county will be overseen by two other county officials. Legislators targeted Harris County’s elections department after taking issue with the way the 2022 elections were run.
Les mer »

Texas Supreme Court denies request to delay new election law despite lawsuit challenging itTexas Supreme Court denies request to delay new election law despite lawsuit challenging itA new Republican-backed Texas law that dictates how elections will be run in the Democratic stronghold of Houston and its surrounding county will take effect as scheduled next month despite a lawsuit seeking to overturn it, the state Supreme Court ruled Tuesday.
Les mer »



Render Time: 2025-02-27 21:45:34