Perspective | The original Comstock Act doesn’t support the new antiabortion decision

Norge Nyheter Nyheter

Perspective | The original Comstock Act doesn’t support the new antiabortion decision
Norge Siste Nytt,Norge Overskrifter
  • 📰 washingtonpost
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 55 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 25%
  • Publisher: 72%

Perspective: Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk rationalized his medication abortion opinion through a distorted reading of the long-dormant 1873 law

, which revoked the constitutional right to an, the availability of medication abortion has become a major battleground, with antiabortion groups pushing to eliminate it by any means possible.

Backed by wealthy donors, Comstock took his impressive collection of pornographic pictures, sex toys and contraceptive materials to Washington, D.C., where he displayed them at the Capitol to help galvanize Congress to pass anti-obscenity legislation. Yet, during floor debate over the bill, Sen. William Alfred Buckingham proposed replacing the physician exception — “line 13.” It is not clear why he did so although some historians have speculated that it might have had to do with a political rivalry between Buckingham and Edmunds, or perhaps he was persuaded by Comstock himself.

Had the physician exemption remained, rather than getting cut by what the legislative history indicates was a bored and recalcitrant Congress that gave little thought to the issue, the implications would have been enormous.Americans immediately made clear their hatred of the new law. In 1878, the National Liberal League, a group that advocated religious freedom and separation of church and state, presented Congress with a petition signed by 50,000 citizens demanding its repeal.

Vi har oppsummert denne nyheten slik at du kan lese den raskt. Er du interessert i nyhetene kan du lese hele teksten her. Les mer:

washingtonpost /  🏆 95. in US

Norge Siste Nytt, Norge Overskrifter

Similar News:Du kan også lese nyheter som ligner på denne som vi har samlet inn fra andre nyhetskilder.

Birth Control and Vaccines Could Be Next If SCOTUS Upholds the Texas Ruling Against Abortion MedicationBirth Control and Vaccines Could Be Next If SCOTUS Upholds the Texas Ruling Against Abortion MedicationIf the Supreme Court upholds the Texas ruling on mifepristone, many other FDA-approved drugs will be at risk. Read the latest from besslevin:
Les mer »

The Comstock Act is no solution for pro-lifers or the FDA's bureaucratic rotThe Comstock Act is no solution for pro-lifers or the FDA's bureaucratic rotIn a Friday afternoon news dump, Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk struck down the Food and Drug Administration's approval of mifepristone more than 20 years ago. Although a separate judge tried to oppose Kacsmaryk’s ruling, the FDA’s approval will inevitably face the highest court in the land. While some…
Les mer »

Pfizer, drugmakers call for reversal of Texas abortion pill rulingPfizer, drugmakers call for reversal of Texas abortion pill rulingLast week’s ruling by Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk undermines the FDA’s authority, the letter’s authors wrote, adding that it ignores decades of scientific evidence and legal precedent…
Les mer »

Overturning Roe vs. Wade was huge, but this abortion case is the biggest yetOverturning Roe vs. Wade was huge, but this abortion case is the biggest yetJudge Matthew Kacsmaryk of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas recently halted FDA approval of the abortion pill.
Les mer »



Render Time: 2025-03-04 12:04:28