'Racist taint.' Will the Supreme Court review a Jim Crow-era voting ban targeted at Black Mississippians?

Norge Nyheter Nyheter

'Racist taint.' Will the Supreme Court review a Jim Crow-era voting ban targeted at Black Mississippians?
Norge Siste Nytt,Norge Overskrifter
  • 📰 USATODAY
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 43 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 21%
  • Publisher: 63%

At Mississippi's 1890 constitutional convention, delegates eliminated the right to vote for people convicted of felonies thought to be 'Black crimes,' a perception based largely on which crimes were prosecuted.

, said that the convention's"first duty" would be to change the state's constitution to ensure"a home government, under the control of the white people of the state," court records show. One county delegate declared that the state's government should be"for all time in the control of the white race."

The constitution that emerged barred people convicted of"bribery, burglary, theft, arson, obtaining money or goods under false pretenses, perjury, forgery, embezzlement or bigamy," from voting. There is little disagreement that the drafters selected crimes that theyWhat's at issue in Harness v. Watson is whether the"taint" of a Jim Crow-era law can be"cured" by later amendments.

Because there is no evidence of discriminatory intent when the state revised the constitution in 1968, Mississippi has argued, the provision is in the clear. "The state's 1950 and 1968 enactments purged any taint from the 1890 law," Mississippi told the Supreme Court. In both cases, the state said,"voters approved in its entirety the new list of crimes by majority vote and without improper purpose."

Vi har oppsummert denne nyheten slik at du kan lese den raskt. Er du interessert i nyhetene kan du lese hele teksten her. Les mer:

USATODAY /  🏆 100. in US

Norge Siste Nytt, Norge Overskrifter

Similar News:Du kan også lese nyheter som ligner på denne som vi har samlet inn fra andre nyhetskilder.

Dark Money-Fueled Wisconsin Supreme Court Candidate’s Anti-Abortion Views Span DecadesDark Money-Fueled Wisconsin Supreme Court Candidate’s Anti-Abortion Views Span DecadesThe billionaire-backed State Supreme Court candidate Daniel Kelly once wrote that “God’s law” applies in court.
Les mer »

Ketanji Brown Jackson has battled, compromised in her first nine months on the Supreme CourtKetanji Brown Jackson has battled, compromised in her first nine months on the Supreme CourtJust under three months shy of the one-year anniversary of her swearing in as the first Black woman to serve on the High Court, Jackson, has already begun to make her mark.
Les mer »

How Ketanji Brown Jackson has fared in her first nine months on Supreme CourtHow Ketanji Brown Jackson has fared in her first nine months on Supreme CourtDuring her first nine months on the Supreme Court, Ketanji Brown Jackson has earned the praise of both her liberal and conservative colleagues, who say the associate justice has “hit the ground running” since being sworn in last year.
Les mer »

Rule of law on the ballot in Wisconsin Supreme Court justice runoff electionRule of law on the ballot in Wisconsin Supreme Court justice runoff electionThe most interesting and perhaps most important single political campaign in 2023 is occurring right now over the seventh and decisive seat on the Wisconsin Supreme Court.
Les mer »

Mexico’s Supreme Court Halts Electoral OverhaulMexico’s Supreme Court Halts Electoral OverhaulMexico’s Supreme Court halted President Andrés Manuel López Obrador’s overhaul of the electoral system after the independent electoral agency filed an appeal on grounds that the measures were unconstitutional
Les mer »

Supreme Court chews on Jack Daniel’s dog toy disputeSupreme Court chews on Jack Daniel’s dog toy disputeThe question for the court has to do with whether the toy makers infringed on Jack Daniel’s trademarks.
Les mer »



Render Time: 2025-03-06 22:21:27