Rand Paul brings Putin’s core argument against Ukraine to Congress.
The exchange between Paul and Blinken perfectly sums up the opposing rhetorical sides of the conflict, which in practice has resulted in the destruction of cities and thousands of deaths. Blinken’s point is that Ukraine is an independent nation, and that if it were in NATO, Russia wouldn’t have attacked it.
Both points are in some ways correct — a conflict between NATO and Russia would be unbelievably disastrous — but in making this point, Paul denies the self-determination of a country of people who did not ask for war. It’s well worth criticizing NATO’s policies in the formation of the current crisis, but only one party in the conflict thus far has violated another nation’s sovereignty and killed its people en masse.
Norge Siste Nytt, Norge Overskrifter
Similar News:Du kan også lese nyheter som ligner på denne som vi har samlet inn fra andre nyhetskilder.
Why Putin’s alleged lover Alina Kabaeva hasn’t been sanctioned over Ukraine warUS officials have so far excluded Russian President Vladimir Putin’s rumored longtime mistress, ex-Olympic gymnast Alina Kabaeva, from several rounds of sanctions following the Ukraine invasion.
Les mer »
Lessons from Sweden's Anti-Putin, Pro-Climate Energy ModelLearning from Sweden´s Anti-Putin, Pro-Climate Energy Model --As Russian tanks continue to roll into Ukraine, western European gas
Les mer »
Putin purges 150 intelligence agents for Ukraine failures: ReportRussian President Vladimir Putin has dismissed about 150 Federal Security Bureau officers, sending some to prison, since Russia's Feb. 24 invasion of Ukraine, according to a report on Monday.
Les mer »
Top Russian diplomat warns Ukraine against provoking WWIIIRussia's top diplomat warned Ukraine against provoking World War III and said the threat of a nuclear conflict 'should not be underestimated' as his country unleashed attacks against rail and fuel installations far from the front lines of Moscow's new eastern offensive.
Les mer »