Supreme Court justices sharply diverged Wednesday over the fairness of Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s death sentence
WASHINGTON—, with liberals questioning the district judge’s exclusion of mitigating evidence and conservatives finding little reason to second-guess decisions made at his 2015 trial.
Tsarnaev and his brother Tamerlan, Chechen immigrants from Kyrgyzstan who followed al Qaeda propaganda online, planted bombs in the 2013 terrorist attack that killed three people and maimed and wounded hundreds of others near the legendary race’s finish line. They fled the scene, committing a spree of additional crimes including the murder of a Massachusetts Institute of Technology campus police officer.
Norge Siste Nytt, Norge Overskrifter
Similar News:Du kan også lese nyheter som ligner på denne som vi har samlet inn fra andre nyhetskilder.
Supreme Court revisits death sentence for Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev8 years after the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing case, which led to the deaths of 3 spectators and a police officer, the Supreme Court will review a lower court opinion that wiped away the death sentence of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev
Les mer »
Supreme Court considers reimposing death sentence for Boston Marathon bomberThe Justice Department is defending Dzhokhar Tsarnaev's death sentence, which a federal appeals court overturned last year.
Les mer »
Supreme Court appears likely to allow death sentence for Boston Marathon bomberThe Justice Department is defending Dzhokhar Tsarnaev's death sentence, which a federal appeals court overturned last year.
Les mer »
US Supreme Court weighs death sentence for Boston marathon bomberPresident Joe Biden's opposition to capital punishment will be put to the side Wednesday when the US Justice Department tries to convince the Supreme Court to reinstate the death penalty for Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev.
Les mer »
Supreme Court considers whether Kentucky attorney general can defend abortion lawIf he prevails, Attorney General Daniel Cameron could ask a federal appeals court to consider the constitutionality of the law, which was struck down in 2019, before he was elected.
Les mer »