The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday upheld a federal law that denies disability benefits to residents of Puerto Rico. Here's why. Full story:
The Supreme Court on Thursday said Congress is not required to extend federal disability benefits to residents of Puerto Rico, finding that denying the payments, which are by law available only to residents of the 50 states and the District of Columbia, does not violate the Constitution.against the bid by Puerto Rico residents to receive equal treatment under the Supplemental Security Income program, with Justice Brett Kavanaugh delivering the opinion for the majority.
But in her dissent, Sotomayor, who is Puerto Rican, called it"utterly irrational" to deny SSI benefits to Puerto Rico residents because they don't pay enough in taxes, given the purpose of the program, and said Congress' decision to deny them a social safety net it provides to nearly all other U.S. citizens is"especially cruel given those citizens' dire need for aid.
"The decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Vaello Madero on the Supplemental Security Income program proves once again that the territorial status of Puerto Rico is discriminatory for American citizens on the island and allows Congress to do whatever they want with us," he said in a statement.
Vaello Madero was successful in the lower courts, but the Supreme Court reversed the decision of the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, with Kavanaugh writing that two earlier decisions from the high court dictated its result.
Norge Siste Nytt, Norge Overskrifter
Similar News:Du kan også lese nyheter som ligner på denne som vi har samlet inn fra andre nyhetskilder.
U.S. Supreme Court declines to extend federal benefits to Puerto RicoCongress can prevent people in the U.S. territory of Puerto Rico from participating in a federal program that provides benefits to low-income elderly, blind and disabled people, the Supreme Court ruled on Thursday. The justices ruled 8-1 in favor of President Joe Biden's administration, saying that the decision by Congress decades ago to exclude Puerto Rico from the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program did not violate a U.S. Constitution mandate that laws apply equally to everyone.
Les mer »
Ohio Supreme Court majority’s unusual, strong language argued state should handle redistricting case -- federal court listenedWhen it struck down the latest round of legislative maps approved by the Ohio Redistricting Commission, the Ohio Supreme Court appeared to be sending a strong message to their colleagues on the federal bench.
Les mer »
Anita Hill Saw History Repeat Itself at Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Supreme Court HearingsThe key witness in Clarence Thomas’s nomination process joins David Remnick and Jane Mayer to discuss how sex and race shaped the new Justice’s experience, and her own.
Les mer »
Man's firing squad execution halted by South Carolina Supreme CourtSouth Carolina’s first-ever firing squad execution of Richard Bernard Moore was halted on Wednesday by the state’s Supreme Court.
Les mer »
Supreme Court considers if police should be sued over failure to read Miranda rightsThe Supreme Court will soon decide a Fifth Amendment-related case over whether a person accused of a crime can seek relief if a law enforcement officer failed to recite Miranda warnings.
Les mer »