Supreme Court to review feds' use of obstruction charge against Jan. 6 defendants, Donald Trump

Norge Nyheter Nyheter

Supreme Court to review feds' use of obstruction charge against Jan. 6 defendants, Donald Trump
Norge Siste Nytt,Norge Overskrifter
  • 📰 WashTimes
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 28 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 14%
  • Publisher: 63%

The fate of hundreds of Jan. 6 defendants lies with the Supreme Court, which will hear a case Tuesday arguing that the obstruction law under which they were charged was never meant to apply to the attack on the U.S. Capitol.

In this June 29, 2020, file photo, the Supreme Court is seen on Capitol Hill in Washington. ** FILE **

Joseph Fischer, one of those convicted under the law, says the statute was intended to snare people who try to destroy evidence of corporate fraud cases, such as document shredding. What went on at the Capitol that day falls far outside that, his lawyers argue. If that is the case, it could do away with two of the four charges Mr. Trump faces in his federal election fraud case.

Federal authorities charged him with seven counts related to the Jan. 6 attack but the one before the justices is Title 18 Section 1512, which reads:

Vi har oppsummert denne nyheten slik at du kan lese den raskt. Er du interessert i nyhetene kan du lese hele teksten her. Les mer:

WashTimes /  🏆 235. in US

Norge Siste Nytt, Norge Overskrifter

Similar News:Du kan også lese nyheter som ligner på denne som vi har samlet inn fra andre nyhetskilder.

Jan. 6 Defendants Warned Supreme Court Plea Could BackfireJan. 6 Defendants Warned Supreme Court Plea Could BackfireA U.S. attorney has issued a warning to Jan. 6 defendants hoping the Supreme Court will throw out a charge used in hundreds of cases.
Les mer »

Supreme Court rejects appeal by New Mexico official ousted from office over Jan. 6Supreme Court rejects appeal by New Mexico official ousted from office over Jan. 6Couy Griffin will not be able to return to his seat as a county commissioner, which he was removed from under the insurrection clause of the 14th Amendment. Couy Griffin Supreme Court rejects appeal by New Mexico official ousted from office over Jan.
Les mer »

Supreme Court rejects appeal by former New Mexico county commissioner banned for Jan. 6 insurrectionSupreme Court rejects appeal by former New Mexico county commissioner banned for Jan. 6 insurrectionThe Supreme Court has rejected an appeal by a former New Mexico county commissioner banished from public office for participating in the Jan. 6 Capitol insurrection
Les mer »

Supreme Court rejects appeal by ex-county commissioner banned for Jan. 6 insurrectionSupreme Court rejects appeal by ex-county commissioner banned for Jan. 6 insurrectionNew Mexico's former Otero County commissioner Couy Griffin is the only elected official thus far to be banned from office in connection with the Capitol attack.
Les mer »

Supreme Court rejects appeal by former New Mexico county commissioner banned for Jan. 6 insurrectionSupreme Court rejects appeal by former New Mexico county commissioner banned for Jan. 6 insurrectionThe Supreme Court has rejected an appeal by a former New Mexico county commissioner banished from public office for participating in the Jan. 6 Capitol insurrection.
Les mer »

Supreme Court Refuses to Help Jan. 6 DefendantSupreme Court Refuses to Help Jan. 6 DefendantA January 6 defendant was hoping the Supreme Court would clear the way for him to hold office again.
Les mer »



Render Time: 2025-02-25 19:18:22