Maine’s failure to fund these schools, the Supreme Court ruled, is discrimination that violates the parents’ religious freedom.
ruling. Taxpayers will be compelled to support schools that may oppose LGBTQ rights, are virulently anti-abortion, and assail any religion that is not their own narrow expression of Christianity. They actively discriminate, denying admission to students who fail to meet stringent religious qualifications, and they refuse to hire anyone who runs afoul of their faith, targeting LGBTQ+ people especially.
There is hope. The Supreme Court did not force Maine to create this voucher-like program; but it has said that if such programs exist, they must include religious schools. We can protect true religious freedom—and protect badly-needed funding for public education—by getting rid of private school vouchers and other taxpayer subsidies for religious education.
This case is a part of that hateful tradition and also the modern attack on public schools waged by a shadow network creating false controversies. The architect of the anti-CRT movement But vouchers aren’t a solution. Study after study shows that students using vouchers to attend private schools do no better academically than their public school peers. Many private schools incorporate elements into their curriculum that are incorrect or hateful and divisive. Oversight, if it exists at all, is lax.
Norge Siste Nytt, Norge Overskrifter
Similar News:Du kan også lese nyheter som ligner på denne som vi har samlet inn fra andre nyhetskilder.
Supreme Court Term in Review: Experts Warn of a Court Coming for Your RightsThis week, Michele Goodwin hosted six law and women's rights experts at the University of California Irvine (UCI) School of Law to discuss the Supreme Court's latest impactful rulings, including Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, West Virginia v. EPA, and more.'The writing has been on the wall for a long time,' said Erwin Chemerinsky at the July 6 event. 'This term was in one sense not a surprise, but it was shocking to see decision after decision come down in a conservative way.'
Les mer »
Lawmakers Answer Supreme Court Threat to LGBTQ+ Equality With Respect for Marriage Act'It's past time for Congress to establish that marriage equality is the law of the land and ensure Americans across the country can continue to marry who they love without discrimination,' Rep. Mondaire Jones said of the Respect for Marriage Act.
Les mer »
Ted Cruz says legalizing gay marriage was ‘clearly wrong’ decision by Supreme Court'I think the decision was clearly wrong when it was decided. It was the court overreaching,' said Ted Cruz about the 2015 case that legalized gay marriage in the United States.
Les mer »
Sen. Ted Cruz Says Supreme Court Gay Marriage Ruling Was IncorrectGay marriage could be next to go as a national right, assuming the Supreme Court falls in line with Ted Cruz's thinking here.
Les mer »
Former IU dean asks Supreme Court to investigate Todd Rokita after comments about doctorIndiana Attorney General Todd Rokita could face disciplinary action for statements he made on national television regarding the Indiana physician who provided abortion services to a 10-year-old Ohio girl.
Les mer »
Sen. Ted Cruz says Supreme Court 'clearly wrong' in decision legalizing same-sex marriageThe Texas Republican's remarks came just weeks after Justice Clarence Thomas said the Supreme Court “should reconsider” past rulings, including Obergefell v. Hodges.
Les mer »