Justice Clarence Thomas urged otherwise.
, in which an evangelical Christian ministry accused the Southern Poverty Law Center of falsely designating it as an anti-LGBTQ hate group.
If it had overturned the ruling, the Supreme Court would have greatly increased the odds of public figures winning libel cases in the future. Instead, the decision delays a long-running push to expand the scope of defamation law.hinges on the “actual malice” standard — a protection that means public figures must show a false statement was made knowingly or with reckless disregard for its truth in order to win a defamation case.
Norge Siste Nytt, Norge Overskrifter
Similar News:Du kan også lese nyheter som ligner på denne som vi har samlet inn fra andre nyhetskilder.
Mississippi Gov. Tate Reeves 'ecstatic' over Supreme Court abortion ruling, says it's a 'win for life'Mississippi Gov. Tate Reeves has reacted to the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, saying he is “ecstatic” about the move he hailed as a “win for life.'
Les mer »
Stacey Abrams calls for federal law establishing abortion rights following Supreme Court rulingGeorgia Democrat Stacey Abrams wants a federal law codifying abortion rights following the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn its landmark ruling that recognized a national right to the procedure.
Les mer »
AOC: Supreme Court justices should be impeached if they lied under oath about their Roe intentionsCongress should consider impeaching conservative Supreme Court justices if they lied during their Senate confirmation hearings, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez...
Les mer »
Rep. Mary Miller draws criticism calling overturning of Roe v. Wade victory for 'White life'; says she misspokeMiller's campaign spokesperson said she misspoke, saying Miller meant to say 'a historic victory for right to life by the Supreme Court.
Les mer »
Blue states scramble for fixes after Supreme Court eases rules on concealed carry of pistolsBlue state leaders are scrambling to draft legislative fixes in the wake of a Supreme Court ruling that imperiled state laws requiring people to show “proper cause” to carry a firearm.
Les mer »