The justices passed up the chance to tinker with Section 230's broad legal protections for tech companies.
The Supreme Court has passed up a closely-watched opportunity to clarify the scope of the federal liability shield known as Section 230 that protects internet companies from most legal claims over content posted by users.
In a pair of rulings Thursday morning, the justices shut down lawsuits seeking to hold giants like Google and Twitter liable for terrorism-promoting content on their platforms, but the court nixed the suits without issuing any sweeping pronouncements on the immunity provision that has come under increasing fire from both Republicans and Democrats.
The cases mark the first time the high court dealt with Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, the 1996 law that gives internet websites broad liability protections for most third-party content posted on their sites. It marks a major win for tech companies that have argued narrowing their decades-old liability shield could be disastrous for the internet, leading to a greater influx of hate speech and extremist content online.
Norge Siste Nytt, Norge Overskrifter
Similar News:Du kan også lese nyheter som ligner på denne som vi har samlet inn fra andre nyhetskilder.
Supreme Court ruling continues to protect Google, Facebook and Twitter from what users postThe Supreme Court declined to address the legal liability shield that protects tech platforms from being held responsible for their users’ posts, the court said in an unsigned opinion.
Les mer »
Supreme Court shields Twitter from liability for terror-related content and leaves Section 230 untouchedTwitter will not have to face accusations it aided and abetted terrorism when it hosted tweets created by the terror group ISIS, the Supreme Court ruled Thursday.
Les mer »
Supreme Court decides in favor of Twitter in anti-terrorism caseBREAKING: The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Twitter in a case that experts claim could have fundamentally changed the way the internet works.
Les mer »
Supreme Court Says Twitter Didn’t Aid TerrorismThe decision clarifies the duties of online platforms to remove terrorist propaganda but avoids larger questions of their liability for posted content.
Les mer »
Supreme Court shields Twitter, social media giants from liability for terror contentNEW: The Supreme Court shields Twitter and other social media giants from liability for aiding Islamic terror attacks by not removing or blocking content.
Les mer »
Abortion pill case moves to appeals court, on track for Supreme CourtA federal appeals court in New Orleans hears arguments Wednesday on whether a drug used in the most common method of abortion was properly approved by a government agency more than two decades ago
Les mer »