U.S. Supreme Court allows retirement plan lawsuit against Intel

Norge Nyheter Nyheter

U.S. Supreme Court allows retirement plan lawsuit against Intel
Norge Siste Nytt,Norge Overskrifter
  • 📰 Reuters
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 47 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 22%
  • Publisher: 97%

The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to back stricter deadlines for worke...

WASHINGTON - The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to back stricter deadlines for workers to sue retirement plans over alleged mismanagement, ruling Intel Corp cannot avoid a suit accusing it of unlawfully making high-risk investments that cost retirement plan beneficiaries hundreds of millions of dollars.

The justices unanimously upheld a lower court decision that revived the proposed class-action lawsuit filed in 2015 by former Intel engineer Christopher Sulyma against the Santa Clara, California-based chipmaker. The justices rejected Intel’s argument that Sulyma’s lawsuit had been filed too late. Sulyma was backed by President Donald Trump’s administration in the case. Sulyma’s suit accused company retirement plans and administrators of breaching their fiduciary duty to the participants by placing an overly heavy emphasis on hedge funds and private equity, in contrast to peer funds.

Sulyma countered that while employed at Intel between 2010 and 2012 he was unaware of the alternative investments, that they performed poorly or even what hedge funds were. He said that he did not have “actual knowledge” of the alleged investment problems because he did not read the relevant documents that were only posted online.

Vi har oppsummert denne nyheten slik at du kan lese den raskt. Er du interessert i nyhetene kan du lese hele teksten her. Les mer:

Reuters /  🏆 2. in US

Norge Siste Nytt, Norge Overskrifter

Similar News:Du kan også lese nyheter som ligner på denne som vi har samlet inn fra andre nyhetskilder.

Supreme Court Rules Border Patrol Agents Who Shoot Foreign Nationals Can't Be SuedSupreme Court Rules Border Patrol Agents Who Shoot Foreign Nationals Can't Be SuedThe U.S. Supreme Court has ruled, in a 5-4 decision, that families of foreign nationals shot by federal agents on foreign territory have no constitutional right to sue for damages in U.S. courts.
Les mer »

Supreme Court denies Mexican family's damages claim for cross-border shootingSupreme Court denies Mexican family's damages claim for cross-border shootingThe case had been watched closely because of President Donald Trump&39;s efforts to build a border wall and to reduce both legal and illegal immigration.
Les mer »

Supreme Court Turns To Immigration With 2 Major CasesSupreme Court Turns To Immigration With 2 Major CasesThe Supreme Court ruled that the parents of a 15-year-old from Mexico who was playing chicken with his friends when he was shot and killed by a U.S. border patrol agent cannot sue the officer who killed him.
Les mer »

Jussie Smollett Pleads With Illinois Supreme Court To Halt New Indictments Over Fake Hate CrimeJussie Smollett Pleads With Illinois Supreme Court To Halt New Indictments Over Fake Hate CrimeAlmost two weeks after being newly indicted on felony charges arising from the alleged fake hate crime attack of January 2019, Jussie Smollett was back in court today, in more ways than one. Appear…
Les mer »

U.S. Supreme Court rejects Apple appeal in patent fight with VirnetXU.S. Supreme Court rejects Apple appeal in patent fight with VirnetXThe U.S. Supreme Court on Monday refused to hear Apple Inc's bid to avoid p...
Les mer »

U.S. Supreme Court turns away religious bias claim against WalgreensU.S. Supreme Court turns away religious bias claim against WalgreensThe U.S. Supreme Court on Monday handed a victory to Walgreens, turning away an appeal by a fired former Florida employee of the pharmacy chain who asked not to work on Saturdays for religious reasons as a member of the Seventh-day Adventist Church. The justices declined to review a lower court ruling
Les mer »



Render Time: 2025-04-02 19:17:22