In the 44-page filing, Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar argued that the states wrongly wished to keep the policy in place “as a makeshift immigration-control measure.”
19 GOP-led states filed an “eleventh hour” emergency appeal to Title 42.There have been multiple calls to impeach Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas amid the migrant crisis.“But the solution to that immigration problem cannot be to extend indefinitely a public-health measure that all now acknowledge has outlived its public-health justification.”
Roberts had given the Biden administration until 5 p.m. to respond to the states after he temporarily stayed a federal court The chief justice can now either deny the states’ application on his own, or — more likely — refer the matter to the full court for consideration.
Norge Siste Nytt, Norge Overskrifter
Similar News:Du kan også lese nyheter som ligner på denne som vi har samlet inn fra andre nyhetskilder.
White House calls mid-morning ‘lid’ as Title 42 fate weighed by Supreme CourtLocal officials are bracing for a massive influx of migrants if the COVID-19 border policy ends.
Les mer »
Justice Gorsuch’s white whale: Supreme Court has new chance to consider agencies’ powerSupreme Court Justice Neil M. Gorsuch was expected to be conservatives’ barbarian at the gates of big government, leading a charge to tear down the 1984 case they pinpoint as a legal justification for expansion of the regulatory state.
Les mer »
Biden tells Supreme Court that states should stay out of legal fight over Title 42 policyBiden's response came a day after Chief Justice Roberts temporarily blocked the Biden administration from ending Title 42 migrant expulsions.
Les mer »
Gay couples in India ask Supreme Court to legalise same-sex marriageFour gay couples have asked India's Supreme Court to recognise same-sex marriages, setting the stage for a legal face-off with Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government which has in the past refused to legalise such marriages.
Les mer »
An 'Imperial Supreme Court' Asserts Its Power, Alarming ScholarsWASHINGTON — The conventional critique of the Supreme Court these days is that it has lurched to the right and is out of step with the public on many issues. That is true so far as it goes. But a burst of recent legal scholarship makes a deeper point, saying the current court is distinctive in a different way: It has rapidly been accumulating power at the expense of every other part of the government. Sign up for The Morning newsletter from the New York Times The phenomenon was documented last m
Les mer »
Supreme Court will hear Section 230 challenges in FebruaryPossibly the first of many.
Les mer »